Load Monitoring in Women’s Professional Soccer

Load Monitoring in Women’s Professional Soccer

As women’s professional soccer continues to evolve and professionalize, the importance of scientific methods to manage player load has never been more evident. Among these, external load monitoring has become a central pillar of modern performance practice.

Load monitoring refers to the ongoing process of measuring, interpreting, and using data to understand how much work an athlete is performing, both in training and matches.

While internal load refers to the athlete’s physiological response (e.g., heart rate, lactate, RPE), external load focuses on the mechanical and physical demands—how far players run, how fast they sprint, how often they accelerate or decelerate, and how frequently they perform high-intensity efforts.

TAKE THE COURSE NOW

In women’s soccer, external load monitoring is particularly important for a number of reasons. Firstly, female athletes exhibit distinct physiological and biomechanical characteristics, including joint structure, hormonal profiles, and muscle fibre composition.

These traits influence how load is absorbed, how fatigue accumulates, and how recovery should be approached (Pedersen et al., 2019; Datson et al., 2014). Secondly, injury patterns—particularly ACL injuries—are more prevalent in the women’s game. Understanding and regulating load is vital in reducing injury risk and ensuring athletes are neither under- nor overtrained (Thompson et al., 2017).

Finally, with increased match density, international call-ups, and travel requirements, player wellness can be compromised without proper monitoring (Carling et al., 2012).

External load monitoring empowers coaches, sports scientists, and medical staff to make informed, data-driven decisions that prioritize performance, preparation, and player health. Rather than guessing or relying on intuition, practitioners can tailor training programs, adapt recovery protocols, and manage player availability with precision.

Technology for Load Monitoring

In the current high-performance environment, technology has revolutionized the ability to track and interpret external load. Among the most widely used tools in women’s professional soccer are GPS systems, local positioning systems (LPS), accelerometers, and inertial measurement units (IMUs).

GPS tracking systems are perhaps the most common tool used in outdoor soccer environments. These devices, often worn in small vests between the shoulder blades, capture an array of metrics including total distance covered, high-speed running (HSR), sprint distance, number of accelerations and decelerations, positional data, and even PlayerLoad—a proprietary calculation that estimates physical demand. GPS is ideal for measuring full-pitch movement and identifying trends across training and competition (Strauss et al., 2019; Fernandes et al., 2025).

For indoor environments or stadiums where satellite coverage may be weak, LPS provides a similar set of metrics using a series of antennas and trackers that triangulate movement. These systems are growing in popularity for their accuracy and consistency, particularly in controlled environments such as indoor training domes or enclosed stadiums.

IMUs and accelerometers embedded in GPS devices provide an additional layer of detail. They measure movement in three planes (x, y, z axes), offering insights into impacts, mechanical load, and changes in direction. This information is particularly useful in understanding the cumulative strain placed on joints and muscles—especially relevant in female athletes who may experience different loading patterns during cutting, landing, or pivoting (Jones et al., 2016).

Software platforms such as Catapult, STATSports, Polar, and Firstbeat allow practitioners to visualize and analyze these data in real time and retrospectively. Reports can be customized to individual players, positional groups, or entire squads. These tools are indispensable in linking load data with fatigue markers, injury history, and performance outcomes.

The integration of video analysis tools with load data is also becoming common practice. This allows coaches to correlate physical metrics with tactical execution, decision-making, and game context, offering a holistic view of performance.

Drill Design Overview

Effective load management in soccer begins not with technology or recovery protocols, but with intelligent and intentional drill design. Training drills are the fundamental building blocks of physical, technical, and tactical development. Every sprint, deceleration, change of direction, or tactical decision made in training stems from the structure and constraints of the drill.

Therefore, how coaches design and sequence drills has a direct impact on the external load experienced by players, shaping both performance adaptation and fatigue accumulation over time (Kelly et al., 2013; Owen, 2023).

At its core, drill design is a process of manipulating variables to elicit specific training outcomes. These variables include area size, player numbers, work-to-rest ratios, ball-in-play time, rules and constraints, and tactical objectives. By thoughtfully adjusting these elements, coaches can target particular physical qualities—such as aerobic endurance, sprint capacity, agility, or repeated sprint ability—while also addressing technical skill or tactical understanding (Little & Williams, 2007; Sarmento et al., 2018).

One of the most influential variables in determining physical output is the size of the playing area. Smaller spaces, such as those used in 3v3 or 4v4 small-sided games (SSGs), typically limit the opportunity for players to reach high running velocities (Owen et al., 2014; Owen et al., 2017).

However, they create environments rich in short accelerations, decelerations, sharp changes of direction, and repeated movement patterns, making them ideal for developing anaerobic capacity and agility under pressure. These drills also promote frequent technical actions and decision-making under spatial and time constraints, increasing cognitive load and technical speed.

In contrast, larger-area drills—such as 8v8, 11v11, or transitional 6v6+GK formats—allow for greater distances to be covered, enabling players to reach high-speed running thresholds and maximal sprint velocities. These drills more closely replicate the spatial and tempo demands of full-match scenarios and are particularly effective for developing sprint endurance, high-speed tolerance, and neuromuscular robustness.

The inclusion of tactical transitions, such as turnovers or counterattacks, can further elevate the physiological intensity, especially when the area encourages longer recovery runs or pressing sequences (Owen et al., 2014; Owen et al., 2017).

Player numbers also significantly influence the physical load of a drill. Fewer players in a given area generally lead to higher involvement rates, increasing both the physical intensity and the technical repetition for each participant. For example, a 3v3 drill in a 20x20m grid requires constant movement, short recovery windows, and a high frequency of high-intensity actions per player.

In contrast, a 10v10 possession drill in a larger space will distribute load more evenly and may decrease the number of intense actions per individual while increasing total distance covered at moderate intensities. Adjusting work-to-rest ratios is another powerful tool for modulating training stress (Owen et al., 2014; Owen et al., 2017; Dellal et al., 2011).

High work-to-rest ratios—where players spend more time working than resting—are useful for developing aerobic and anaerobic endurance but may lead to rapid fatigue if used excessively. Lower ratios, where recovery periods are longer and more complete, allow players to maintain higher output during work intervals, which is particularly important for sprint development and power-focused training.

For instance, repeated sprint drills with 1:6 work-to-rest ratios allow for quality execution of each sprint, while 1:2 or 1:1 ratios increase metabolic stress and build resilience under fatigue.

Beyond physical outputs, ball-in-play time can be a determining factor in how drills affect player load. A drill that frequently stops for instruction or has unclear transitions may disrupt the physiological stimulus. Conversely, continuous play formats or drills with automatic restarts (e.g., coach-fed balls or multi-ball systems) help maintain tempo and metabolic demand, leading to higher cardiovascular stress and greater consistency in external load delivery (O’Donoghue, 2022; Little & Williams, 2007).

Drill constraints—such as limiting touches, forcing direction changes, or introducing overloads (e.g., 4v3)—add a layer of specificity that can alter not only the technical emphasis but also the intensity and type of physical movement. For example, a one-touch passing rule in a small-sided game increases mental sharpness and pace, but may also elevate heart rate and reduce recovery time between movements.

Similarly, drills with defensive pressing triggers or man to man marking can raise the volume of high-intensity accelerations as players respond to tactical cues (Ngo et al., 2012; Aasgaard & Kilding, 2020).

In professional women’s soccer, where recovery timelines and fatigue profiles vary between individuals, drill design becomes even more nuanced. Hormonal influences, menstrual cycle fluctuations, and energy availability can affect how a female athlete responds to physical stress on a given day. Therefore, designing drills that deliver an appropriate yet adaptable stimulus is critical.

For instance, if a player is in a phase of her cycle where fatigue tolerance is reduced, a high-intensity drill may need to be shortened in duration or altered in work-to-rest structure to prevent overreaching. Likewise, drills with lower neuromuscular demand but high cognitive load can be used on days where central fatigue is high but physical readiness is moderate.

Coaches must also think beyond individual drills and consider how load accumulates across a session and throughout a training week (microcycle). A session that begins with a high-speed passing drill followed by a large-sided game may produce a compounded physical effect, especially on lower limb musculature.

If such a session is scheduled too closely to a match, or stacked on top of other high-load days, players may enter competition with residual fatigue. Conversely, if small-sided drills dominate a week with little exposure to sprinting or high-speed running, players may not be sufficiently prepared for the demands of match play.

Categorizing drills into intensity zones—low, moderate, high—and identifying their primary training stimulus—whether aerobic, anaerobic, strength-endurance, technical-tactical, or speed-power—allows for structured planning. For example, an early-week session (MD-5 or MD-4) might feature high-intensity, large-sided games with sprint efforts, while mid-week may focus on technical refinement in small spaces, and later-week sessions (MD-1 or MD-2) may include low-load tactical walk-throughs or set-piece rehearsals. This kind of sequencing ensures both physical development and strategic load tapering (Owen et al., 2024).

Ultimately, effective drill design is both an art and a science. It requires a deep understanding of the game, the athletes, and the intended outcome. Coaches who master the variables of space, time, and player engagement can craft sessions that not only meet the physiological needs of the sport but also respect the individual readiness, recovery, and developmental stages of female soccer players.

As the women’s game continues to professionalize, this level of specificity in drill design will be essential in delivering safe, challenging, and performance-enhancing training environments.

Setting Thresholds to Maximize Performance

One of the most valuable outcomes of load monitoring is the ability to set and adjust individualized performance thresholds. These thresholds define target ranges for key metrics—such as sprint meters per session, number of high-speed runs, or total PlayerLoad—that guide both training and match load management. Setting thresholds requires a foundation of baseline data.

This involves collecting several weeks or months of consistent training and match data to identify norms and deviations. From this database, staff can establish zonal thresholds (low, moderate, high intensity) and tailor workloads accordingly (Kavanagh et al., 2024).

For example, a wide forward might average 1,200 meters of high-speed running in a 90-minute match. This value can be used as a benchmark when designing training sessions to simulate game-specific demands. If the player is in a return-to-play phase, the goal may be to gradually progress their high-speed running from 25%, to 50%, to 75%, and finally 100% of this value over several sessions.

Thresholds must also account for inter-individual variability. Two players in the same position may have different outputs due to playing style, aerobic capacity, or tactical role. Rigidly applying one-size-fits-all metrics across a squad can lead to undertraining some players and overloading others. Personalized thresholds enhance precision and safety, allowing staff to push players where appropriate and protect them when necessary (Kavanagh et al., 2024; Dello Iacono et al., 2023).

High-Intensity Loading Strategies

High-intensity efforts—sprints, explosive accelerations, high-speed decelerations, and repeated maximal efforts—are often the defining physical components of modern soccer performance. These actions frequently determine the outcome of a match, particularly in transition moments, defensive recoveries, and goal-scoring situations. In the elite women’s game, where margins are increasingly fine, the ability to perform high-intensity actions under fatigue, repeatedly and reliably, is a performance differentiator that separates top-tier players from their peers (Sjökvist et al., 2011).

As such, high-intensity loading must be more than just a general component of training—it must be purposefully integrated into microcycles and strategically manipulated to optimize readiness and output.

Training for high-intensity performance requires planned, progressive, and individualized exposure. Players must be frequently challenged through drills and sessions that simulate match-specific intensities (Sjökvist et al., 2011; Owen, 2023). However, there is a delicate balance to strike. Underexposure to high-intensity loading can lead to stagnation in physical development, reduced game impact, and heightened injury risk when players are suddenly required to perform such actions during competition.

Conversely, overexposure—particularly without sufficient recovery—can cause excessive neuromuscular fatigue, increase the likelihood of soft tissue injuries, and diminish performance on match day. This highlights the critical importance of training periodization and recovery planning in managing high-intensity work.

In a typical seven-day training microcycle, high-intensity days should be deliberately positioned to allow both physiological adaptation and recovery. Optimal placement tends to fall 3–4 days prior to a match (commonly referred to as MD-4 or MD-3), where players are far enough from game day to accommodate fatigue and adaptation, yet close enough to benefit from the performance-enhancing effects of neuromuscular stimulation. These sessions may include a variety of formats designed to elevate speed, anaerobic capacity, and repeat sprint ability (Owen et al., 2024).

Examples of effective high-intensity training formats include repeated sprint ability (RSA) drills, where players perform multiple short sprints (typically 20–40 meters) with limited recovery to mimic game scenarios. Sprint-max efforts—short bursts with full recovery—are useful for developing peak velocity and acceleration mechanics (Sjökvist et al., 2011). Large-sided games (e.g., 8v8 or 11v11 in expanded spaces) also offer a practical way to expose players to high-speed running under tactical pressure, providing both physiological and cognitive stimulus.

Additionally, small-sided drills with transitional constraints (e.g., 1v1, 2v2 with recovery jogs) can push players to make decisions at speed, develop anaerobic endurance, and sharpen game-specific explosiveness (Owen et al., 2024; Mohr et al., 2008).

Beyond drill selection, session sequencing is a crucial factor in the success of high-intensity loading. High-intensity sessions should not be placed back-to-back with similarly demanding days unless the intent is to simulate game-load fatigue. More commonly, they are scheduled after a low-load or recovery-focused day to ensure the neuromuscular system is sufficiently fresh to tolerate maximal output. If a player enters a session carrying residual fatigue—whether physiological or cognitive—their ability to produce and adapt to high-intensity effort is compromised.

This is where readiness monitoring becomes invaluable. By tracking key indicators such as heart rate variability (HRV), subjective wellness scores, sleep duration and quality, and muscle soreness, performance staff can evaluate whether a player is primed for high-load work or whether modifications are necessary (Flatt et al., 2017; Costa et al., 2022). Players showing low readiness may benefit from reduced volume, modified drills, or adjusted roles in the session to protect long-term performance integrity. The use of objective data from wearable technologies combined with open communication between staff and athletes forms the backbone of intelligent high-intensity planning.

In the context of professional women’s soccer, individualized programming is especially important due to the diverse demands players face both on and off the field. Many female athletes balance additional responsibilities, such as international competitions, academic commitments, family life, and in some cases dual careers. These external factors can influence recovery capacity, stress levels, and overall readiness to train. Failing to acknowledge these realities in high-performance planning can lead to chronic overload and performance plateau.

Moreover, biological considerations such as the menstrual cycle must be factored into high-intensity programming. Certain phases of the cycle, such as the late luteal phase, may be associated with increased fatigue, decreased reaction time, and higher injury risk due to hormonal changes that influence ligament laxity and neuromuscular control.

By integrating menstrual tracking into load planning, coaches can choose the most appropriate days to emphasize high-intensity loading and ensure that recovery protocols are aligned with each athlete’s unique hormonal profile (Igonin et al., 2022; Datson et al., 2014).

To further enhance the effectiveness of high-intensity work, performance staff may use periodic performance assessments, such as sprint testing, countermovement jumps (CMJ), and repeated sprint tests, to track neuromuscular status and progress. These assessments offer valuable insight into whether an athlete is responding positively to high-load exposure or exhibiting signs of overreaching.

For instance, a noticeable drop in jump height or sprint speed may indicate central nervous system fatigue, warranting a temporary reduction in load or an increase in recovery emphasis (Kamandulis et al., 2016). Importantly, high-intensity loading is not a static or uniform process—it must evolve throughout the season. In the pre-season phase, the focus may be on building high-intensity capacity and tolerance, progressively increasing load to develop robustness.

During congested in-season periods, the emphasis often shifts toward maintenance and micro-dosing, ensuring that athletes stay sharp without accumulating unnecessary fatigue. In tapering phases, such as the days leading into critical fixtures or tournaments, sharp, short bursts of maximal effort may be included to stimulate the neuromuscular system without compromising freshness (Liu et al., 2024).

In conclusion, high-intensity loading strategies are essential for developing game-changing performance qualities, particularly in elite women’s soccer where pace, power, and repeated efforts play an increasing role in match outcomes.

By incorporating data-informed decision-making, individualized readiness monitoring, thoughtful periodization, and biological considerations, coaching staff can deliver high-intensity training that enhances performance while safeguarding long-term athlete health. The key lies not just in delivering intensity, but in delivering the right intensity, to the right athlete, at the right time.

Combining High-Intensity and De-loading

No performance plan is complete without the strategic and intelligent integration of de-loading periods. De-loading, in the context of high-performance sport, refers to the intentional reduction in training volume, intensity, or both, with the aim of allowing the athlete’s body to recover, regenerate, and adapt to previous training loads. Far from being a sign of reduced effort or laziness, de-loading is a scientifically grounded approach that plays a central role in enhancing long-term performance, minimizing injury risk, and supporting sustainable athletic development (De Marco et al., 2024; Coleman et al., 2024).

In women’s soccer, de-loading assumes even greater importance. Female athletes are subject to a complex interplay of physiological, hormonal, and biomechanical factors that can influence fatigue accumulation, tissue recovery, and readiness to train. Menstrual cycle fluctuations, iron availability, bone health, and joint stability can all be influenced by training load. A player who is exposed to relentless high-intensity stimuli without the opportunity for structured recovery is not only more likely to underperform but also at higher risk of overtraining, burnout, or serious injury—particularly to the ACL or other soft tissues.

The foundation of effective training is not simply pushing hard but knowing when and how to pull back. De-loading strategies should be applied proactively, rather than reactively after an athlete breaks down. This requires meticulous planning, open communication, and real-time feedback from athletes and performance monitoring systems. The goal of de-loading is to ensure that players not only return to baseline fitness but enter a supercompensated state—where performance capacity increases as a result of recovery from stress (De Marco et al., 2024; Coleman et al., 2024).

De-loading can take many forms, and it should be individualized based on the player’s training history, injury profile, menstrual cycle phase, match calendar, and psychological readiness. A typical de-load phase may involve a reduction in pitch training duration, intensity, or frequency.

For instance, tactical drills can be shortened or played at lower speeds, with emphasis placed on positional awareness, team shape, or communication rather than physical output. Active recovery protocols, such as low-intensity aerobic work (e.g., bike or swim sessions), yoga, or mobility-based circuits, can also maintain movement and blood flow while minimizing stress on joints and soft tissues.

Cross-training is another valuable de-loading strategy, particularly for maintaining fitness without adding excessive impact. Pool running, elliptical sessions, and even Pilates or dance-based movement routines can provide variety and recovery stimulus without contributing to neuromuscular fatigue.

For strength and conditioning, low-impact strength sessions can shift focus to joint stabilization, proprioceptive control, core engagement, and postural integrity, reinforcing movement quality while allowing larger muscle groups time to recover. Importantly, de-loading is not simply about doing less. It’s about doing the right things at the right time to support the recovery-adaptation cycle.

A well-planned de-load might still include technical sessions, especially for younger players developing skill fluency. However, these sessions would be delivered at lower intensity and complexity, reducing decision-making demands and cardiovascular strain. Similarly, psychological recovery should be emphasized. This might involve shorter meetings, mindfulness activities, journaling, or time away from the training facility to mentally refresh and reset.

A wide range of recovery tools and interventions can be layered into de-loading weeks to accelerate regeneration. Hydrotherapy, including contrast baths or cold-water immersion, can reduce inflammation and promote muscle recovery (Vaile et al., 2008). Massage therapy and soft tissue release can help alleviate muscle tightness and support parasympathetic nervous system activity. 

Sleep extension strategies, including scheduled naps and optimized sleep hygiene practices, are also crucial, given the strong relationship between sleep quality and performance (Gupta et al., 2017). Breathing techniques, guided meditation, and visualization can further enhance the body’s ability to return to a rested and responsive state.

The timing of de-loading phases is critical. Coaches and performance staff must pay close attention to both objective and subjective data to guide these decisions. Monitoring tools—such as GPS metrics, sprint velocity tracking, high-speed running volumes, heart rate variability (HRV), and neuromuscular tests like countermovement jump (CMJ) height—can provide early indicators of fatigue or stagnation.

For example, a gradual decline in maximal sprint output or jump power across several sessions may point to excessive cumulative load. Similarly, consistent reports of poor sleep, low motivation, sore muscles, or mood disturbance can signal that a player needs a reduction in training stress (Gupta et al., 2017; De Marco et al., 2024; Coleman et al., 2024).

Menstrual cycle tracking is another vital piece of information in determining when to de-load. Certain phases of the menstrual cycle—particularly the late luteal and early follicular phases—may be associated with increased physical and emotional fatigue, changes in thermoregulation, and decreased neuromuscular control.

In these periods, even highly conditioned athletes may experience reduced tolerance to high-intensity work. Recognizing this, coaches can schedule de-loads during these hormonally sensitive windows to support recovery, while maintaining continuity in skill and tactical development (Igonin et al., 2022).

The design of a de-load phase should also be responsive to external stressors. Professional female athletes often navigate additional demands outside of training, including academic or family commitments, media responsibilities, travel fatigue, and psychological pressures. During busy periods—such as tournament play or international call-ups—de-loading between competitions can help offset accumulated stress and reduce the likelihood of delayed-onset injuries or illness. Customizing load reduction strategies around life demands demonstrates a holistic, athlete-centered approach to performance.

While many de-load periods are planned in advance—often following intense training blocks or match congestion—others are introduced reactively, in response to unexpected dips in performance, motivation, or well-being. The key is to create a culture where rest and recovery are seen as integral to performance, not as signs of weakness or laziness. Educating athletes about the purpose and benefits of de-loading empowers them to embrace recovery as a necessary and productive part of their development (Mallo, 2011).

In elite environments, the most successful teams are those that plan intensively, execute with discipline, and recover with intention. High performance is not built by simply doing more; it is sustained by doing the right things consistently and knowing when to push, hold, or pull back. De-loading strategies are not just an optional extra—they are a performance enhancer, an injury prevention tool, and a critical pillar of long-term player welfare.

In conclusion, effective load management is a cyclical process, and de-loading is its essential counterpart. In the women’s game, where physiological and life demands are distinct and often variable, de-loading strategies must be thoughtfully integrated, personalized, and responsive. When done correctly, de-loading doesn’t interrupt performance—it elevates it.

Conclusion

The application of load monitoring in women’s professional soccer represents a vital frontier in sports science and athlete welfare. Through smart use of technology, context-driven training design, and ongoing communication between staff and players, teams can optimize performance, enhance recovery, and extend player longevity.

As the women’s game continues to accelerate in intensity and professionalism, data-informed training strategies will not only enhance physical outcomes but foster a more sustainable, athlete-centred culture of excellence.

To develop further in this key area of high performance coaching, the ISSPF online Professional Certificate in Women’s Soccer Science & High Performance Coaching has been specifically designed to equip coaches, sport scientists, and performance professionals with the specialised knowledge and practical skills necessary to excel in the rapidly evolving world of women’s soccer. Delivered by leading specialists at the forefront of the women’s game, this course delves into critical aspects of athletic development and performance, offering unparalleled insights into the female athlete.

Each module within this program is meticulously crafted to provide you with a deep understanding of key topics, ensuring you’re well-prepared to support and optimise the performance of female soccer players. Here’s a brief introduction to each lecture and the key outcomes you can expect.

TAKE THE COURSE NOW

References (click to expand)

Pedersen, A.V., Aksdal, I.M. and Stalsberg, R., 2019. Scaling demands of soccer according to anthropometric and physiological sex differences: A fairer comparison of men’s and women’s soccer. Frontiers in psychology, 10, p.762.

• Datson, N., Hulton, A., Andersson, H., Lewis, T., Weston, M., Drust, B. and Gregson, W., 2014. Applied physiology of female soccer: an update. Sports medicine, 44, pp.1225-1240.

• Thompson, J.A., Tran, A.A., Gatewood, C.T., Shultz, R., Silder, A., Delp, S.L. and Dragoo, J.L., 2017. Biomechanical effects of an injury prevention program in preadolescent female soccer athletes. The American journal of sports medicine, 45(2), pp.294-301.

• Carling, C., Le Gall, F. and Dupont, G., 2012. Are physical performance and injury risk in a professional soccer team in match-play affected over a prolonged period of fixture congestion?. International journal of sports medicine, 33(01), pp.36-42.

• Strauss, A., Sparks, M. and Pienaar, C., 2019. The use of GPS analysis to quantify the internal and external match demands of semi-elite level female soccer players during a tournament. Journal of sports science & medicine, 18(1), p.73.

• Fernandes, R., Martins, A.D., Clemente, F.M., Brito, J.P., Nobari, H., Reis, V. and Oliveira, R., 2025. Variations of distance and accelerometry-based GPS measures and their influence on body composition in professional women soccer players. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part P: Journal of Sports Engineering and Technology, 239(1), pp.20-28.

• Jones, P.A., Herrington, L. and Graham-Smith, P., 2016. Braking characteristics during cutting and pivoting in female soccer players. Journal of Electromyography and Kinesiology, 30, pp.46-54.

• Kelly, D.M., Gregson, W., Reilly, T. and Drust, B., 2013. The development of a soccer-specific training drill for elite-level players. The Journal of Strength & Conditioning Research, 27(4), pp.938-943.

• Little, T. and Williams, A.G., 2007. Measures of exercise intensity during soccer training drills with professional soccer players. The Journal of Strength & Conditioning Research, 21(2), pp.367-371.

1. Sarmento, H., Clemente, F.M., Harper, L.D., Costa, I.T.D., Owen, A. and Figueiredo, A.J., 2018. Small sided games in soccer–a systematic review. International journal of performance analysis in sport, 18(5), pp.693-749.

1. Owen, A.L., Wong, D.P., Paul, D. and Dellal, A., 2014. Physical and technical comparisons between various-sided games within professional soccer. International journal of sports medicine, 35(04), pp.286-292.

1. Owen, A.L., Lago-Peñas, C., Gómez, M.Á., Mendes, B. and Dellal, A., 2017. Analysis of a training mesocycle and positional quantification in elite European soccer players. International Journal of Sports Science & Coaching, 12(5), pp.665-676.

1. Dellal, A., Jannault, R., Lopez-Segovia, M. and Pialoux, V., 2011. Influence of the numbers of players in the heart rate responses of youth soccer players within 2 vs. 2, 3 vs. 3 and 4 vs. 4 small-sided games. Journal of human kinetics, 28, p.107.

1. O’Donoghue, P.G., 2002. Time-motion analysis of work-rate in English FA Premier League soccer. International Journal of Performance Analysis in Sport, 2(1), pp.36-43.

1. Little, T. and Williams, A.G., 2007. Effects of sprint duration and exercise: rest ratio on repeated sprint performance and physiological responses in professional soccer players. The Journal of Strength & Conditioning Research, 21(2), pp.646-648.

1. Dellal, A., Wong, D.P., Moalla, W. and Chamari, K., 2010. Physical and technical activity of soccer players in the French First League-with special reference to their playing position. International SportMed Journal, 11(2), pp.278-290.

1. Ngo, J.K., Tsui, M.C., Smith, A.W., Carling, C., Chan, G.S. and Wong, D.P., 2012. The effects of man-marking on work intensity in small-sided soccer games. Journal of sports science & medicine, 11(1), p.109.

1. Aasgaard, M. and Kilding, A.E., 2020. Does man marking influence running outputs and intensity during small-sided soccer games?. The Journal of Strength & Conditioning Research, 34(11), pp.3266-3274.

1. Kavanagh, R., Di Michele, R., Oliveira, R., McDaid, K., Rhodes, D. and Morgans, R., 2024. The relationships between distances covered above generic and relative speed thresholds by male soccer players in English Premier League matches across two competitive seasons. The effects of positional demands and possession. Biology of Sport, 41(4), pp.77-86.

• Dello Iacono, A., McLaren, S.J., Macpherson, T.W., Beato, M., Weston, M., Unnithan, V.B. and Shushan, T., 2023. Quantifying exposure and intra-individual reliability of high-speed and sprint running during sided-games training in soccer players: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Sports Medicine, 53(2), pp.371-413.

• Sjökvist, J., Laurent, M.C., Richardson, M., Curtner-Smith, M., Holmberg, H.C. and Bishop, P.A., 2011. Recovery from high-intensity training sessions in female soccer players. The Journal of Strength & Conditioning Research, 25(6), pp.1726-1735.
• Owen, A., Weston, M. and Clancy, C., 2024. Between-microcycle variability of external soccer training loads through the evaluation of a contemporary periodisation training model ‘CUPs’. International Journal of Sports Science & Coaching, 19(5), pp.2067-2077.

• Mohr, M., Krustrup, P., Andersson, H., Kirkendal, D. and Bangsbo, J., 2008. Match activities of elite women soccer players at different performance levels. The Journal of Strength & Conditioning Research, 22(2), pp.341-349.

• Flatt, A.A., Esco, M.R. and Nakamura, F.Y., 2017. Individual heart rate variability responses to preseason training in high level female soccer players. The Journal of Strength & Conditioning Research, 31(2), pp.531-538.

• Costa, J.A., Brito, J., Nakamura, F.Y., Dores, H. and Rebelo, A., 2022. Associations between 24‐h heart rate variability and aerobic fitness in high‐level female soccer players. Scandinavian Journal of Medicine & Science in Sports, 32, pp.140-149.

• Igonin, P.H., Rogowski, I., Boisseau, N. and Martin, C., 2022. Impact of the menstrual cycle phases on the movement patterns of sub-elite women soccer players during competitive matches. International journal of environmental research and public health, 19(8), p.4465.

• Kamandulis, S., Venckunas, T., Snieckus, A., Nickus, E., Stanislovaitiene, J. and Skurvydas, A., 2016. Changes of vertical jump height in response to acute and repetitive fatiguing conditions. Science & Sports, 31(6), pp.e163-e171.

• Liu, G., Wang, X. and Xu, Q., 2024. Microdosing plyometric training enhances jumping performance, reactive strength index, and acceleration among youth soccer players: a randomized controlled study design. Journal of Sports Science & Medicine, 23(2), p.342.

• De Marco, M.K., Goods, P., Baldwin, K., Hiscock, D. and Scott, B., 2024. Resistance Training Prescription For Athletes During Periods Of Planned De-Loading: A Survey Of Strength And Conditioning Coaches. Journal of Clinical Exercise Physiology, 13(s2), pp.355-355.

• Coleman, M., Burke, R., Augustin, F., Piñero, A., Maldonado, J., Fisher, J.P., Israetel, M., Korakakis, P.A., Swinton, P., Oberlin, D. and Schoenfeld, B.J., 2024. Gaining more from doing less? The effects of a one-week deload period during supervised resistance training on muscular adaptations. PeerJ, 12, p.e16777.

• Vaile, J., Halson, S., Gill, N. and Dawson, B., 2008. Effect of hydrotherapy on recovery from fatigue. International journal of sports medicine, 29(07), pp.539-544.

• Gupta, L., Morgan, K. and Gilchrist, S., 2017. Does elite sport degrade sleep quality? A systematic review. Sports Medicine, 47, pp.1317-1333.
• Mallo, J., 2011. Effect of block periodization on performance in competition in a soccer team during four consecutive seasons: A case study. International Journal of Performance Analysis in Sport, 11(3), pp.476-485